Introduction: Overview of thesis.

The what: Melinda Kendall’s invisibility in literary history and confused, contradictory existence in the story of Henry Kendall. This paper’s hope that a clearer version of Melinda Kendall can be made available, incorporating a better-researched personal chronology and life history, with reference to her writings and the personal philosophy apparent in them.
The how: An outline of theoretical positions I’ll be looking at (eg, Gynocritism, regionalism debate, feminist notions of exclusion, theory involved in re-remembering, hierarchies of power in relation to Melinda’s position as mother / regional writer / 19th century woman writer, as discussed in detail in further chapters).
The why: A Case for Her Inclusion: Melinda Kendall’s place in the scholarship of remembering nineteenth century Australian women writers, citing the reasons other women have been re-remembered, as well as her exclusion from Australian literary bibliographies (incorporating material from Literature Review).
Chapter 1: Will the Real Henry’s Mother …?

Clarification of the confusing entity she is within Henry’s history, with results of my archival research into her family history and personal details, in much more detail than in the Introduction. This could include “sharpening the blurred focus,” a clarified version of her life away from the confusion and contradiction that exists in “Preliminary Findings”. I will address each of the anomalies in turn, and present the findings of my research regarding each. Melinda Kendall’s undoing of her myth within her own writing: Is she sending the message about wanting to become a writer in her own right? An examination of the writings: is she narrating her legacy of being Henry’s mother and her need to be recognised as her own writer?

Chapter 2: Will the Real Illawarra / Regional Writer …?

With reference to her situation in the Illawarra and in other regional areas, material clarifying our subject of research as Melinda McNally (and possibly Melinda Hill) before she was Henry’s mother, and after Henry’s death as a regional writer in her own right. Reference to her Temperance stance in later writings, as opposed to her depiction as a dypsomaniac during Henry’s lifetime would be helpful here.

Chapter 3: Her Place in the Scholarship of Re-Remembering:

With reference to the scholarship surrounding the Colonial Texts series, as well as other scholarship about 19th Century women writers and the process of re-remembering them. Some mention here of histories of the Illawarra and Melinda Kendall’s exclusion from them. Once again, the “parameters of exclusion” (and inclusion) would bring into focus the reasons why Illawarra local history texts have not included her (aspects of this could also be included in the previous chapter related to regionalism). [This Chapter 3 of the Outline Redesign will now include the what was previously a separate chapter: Parameters of Exclusion: These will include some of the regionalism / centralism issues I identified in my MA (Hons) thesis, and the Literature Review for that paper – issues surrounding Illawarra writers being excluded from “centralist” literary histories.]

Chapter 4: Will the Real Nineteenth-Century Writer …?

An overview of 19th Century Australian literary society (The Stenhouse Circle, eg) could be valuable in this chapter, as a way of positioning Melinda Kendall in her times. A “Chronology” of dates of publication of her works, connected with and compared to her biographical details and the events of history that may have affected her (per “Stenhouse autobiography quote?).

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: